Jews and Christians in the UN's Crosshairs

In the last few days, a lot has been written and said about the recent UNSC Resolution 2334 and its adversarial relationship to the State of Israel generally, and to the Jewish people in particular.  Yet, as far as I know, little or nothing has appeared in print regarding how that same UNSC Resolution 2334 represents an equally bold, if perhaps less obvious, attack against Christianity and Christians worldwide.  Following, is a portion of that Resolution's text:

"Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions.... 

"Expressing grave concern that continuing Israeli settlement activities are dangerously imperilling [sic] the viability of the two-State solution based on the 1967 lines.... 

"Recalling the obligation under the Quartet Roadmap, endorsed by its resolution 1515 (2003), for a freeze by Israel of all settlement activity, including “natural growth”, and the dismantlement of all settlement outposts erected since March 2001"   (emphasis and underlining added)

The above mentioned Resolution, taken together with two other Resolutions which were approved in October 2016, by UNESCO's World Heritage Committee ~ which Resolutions expressly deny the Jewish history associated with the city of Jerusalem and with the Temple Mount in Jerusalem; make it abundantly clear that the UN and its affiliated agencies are determined not only to deny to Israel the right of self-determination in their own historic homeland.  But the UN coteries are willing even to rewrite history, in order as they have fabricated a mythical 'history' related to what they call, "Palestinian Territory...including East Jerusalem," in their efforts to impose a "two-State solution" upon the land and peoples of Israel.

In so doing, the UN gang has denied and furthermore attempted to refute the historicity of the Bible, thereby making the Bible to appear, in the eyes of the whole world, as nothing else but a collection of fables ~ and false ones at that.  If the Bible's voluminous record involving the history of Israel cannot be trusted, then neither can anything else the Bible has to say, be trusted.  But the Bible is holy to Christians as well as to Jews.  Every attack upon the veracity of the Bible is an attack upon both Jews and Christians alike.  

In his important article titled, "The Muslim Claim To Jerusalem" (here), Daniel Pipes identified the stark contrast between the Bible's prolific references to Jerusalem, versus the complete absence of any reference to Jerusalem, in the Qu'ran; where Pipes wrote:

"Jerusalem appears in the Jewish Bible [Old Testament] 669 times and Zion (which usually means Jerusalem, sometimes the Land of Israel) 154 times, or 823 times in all. The Christian Bible [New Testament] mentions Jerusalem 154 times and Zion 7 times.  In contrast, the columnist Moshe Kohn notes, Jerusalem and Zion appear as frequently in the Qur'an "as they do in the Hindu Bhagavad-Gita, the Taoist Tao-Te Ching, the Buddhist Dhamapada and the Zoroastrian Zend Avesta"—which is to say, not once."

A wealth of archeological evidence further establishes the Jewish connection with the land of Israel including the city of Jerusalem; predating by many centuries the earliest conception of Islam.  Such artifacts bear witness not only to the history of the Jews in Israel but, no less important, to the truthfulness of the Biblical record.  The brazen denial of which ~ the remarkable agreement between the Bible and archeological evidence, constitutes evidence of another kind: which is to say, of the willful, political agenda of the UN plutocracy.

The United Nations consists of more than a few raving antisemites.  It is the tool of not a few antichrists, too.